Evolving Concept of Bipolar Bone Loss and the Hill-Sachs Lesion: From “Engaging/Non-Engaging” Lesion to “On-Track/Off-Track” Lesion

Evolving Concept of Bipolar Bone Loss and the Hill-Sachs Lesion: From “Engaging/Non-Engaging” Lesion to “On-Track/Off-Track” Lesion

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24384275

 2014 Jan;30(1):90-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.10.004.

Evolving concept of bipolar bone loss and the hill-sachs lesion: from “engaging/non-engaging” lesion to “on-track/off-track” lesion.

Abstract

For anterior instability with glenoid bone loss comprising 25% or more of the inferior glenoid diameter (inverted-pear glenoid), the consensus of recent authors is that glenoid bone grafting should be performed. Although the engaging Hill-Sachs lesion has been recognized as a risk factor for recurrent anterior instability, there has been no generally accepted method for quantifying the Hill-Sachs lesion and then integrating that quantification into treatment recommendations, taking into account the geometric interplay of various sizes and various orientations of bipolar (humeral-sided plus glenoid-sided) bone loss. We have developed a method (both radiographic and arthroscopic) that uses the concept of the glenoid track to determine whether a Hill-Sachs lesion will engage the anterior glenoid rim, whether or not there is concomitant anterior glenoid bone loss. If the Hill-Sachs lesion engages, it is called an “off-track” Hill-Sachs lesion; if it does not engage, it is an “on-track” lesion. On the basis of our quantitative method, we have developed a treatment paradigm with specific surgical criteria for all patients with anterior instability, both with and without bipolar bone loss.
Copyright © 2014 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PMID:

 

24384275

 

[PubMed – in process]

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *